HOME CANCER GLOSSARY  CANCER PHOTOS  NEW CANCER BOOKS  LINKING  ADVERTISE

   
 

Free Financial Help for Cancer Patients
Gov't regulated program

Breast Cancer "Switch" Found

Cancer Pictures

Best Natl Cancer Ctrs

Cancer Centers
by State


Cancer Societies

Newest Treatments
by cancer type

MyCancerNews.com

Cancer Newsletters

Medical Journals

Cancer Calculator

Nat'l Cancer Inst.

MedLine Cancer

Chemotherapy

Other helpful links

Additional Help
for Cancer Patients

More Cancer Photos

Diabetes Current Topics in Diabetes

Painless Test Checks Blood Sugar


Medically Reviewed On: January 08, 2007

(HealthCentersOnline) - A painless new diabetes-screening device is more accurate than traditional glucose tests that use needles, researchers report.

The most common screening test for diabetes and prediabetes is the fasting plasma glucose test (FPG). It involves overnight fasting and use of a needle-tipped syringe to withdraw a blood sample for analysis of glucose (blood sugar) in a laboratory. Public health authorities recommend routine diabetes screening in people who are 45 or older or who have other risk factors for the disease, such as obesity or a family history of diabetes.

Physicians sometimes employ a nonfasting blood test called the glycohemoglobin A1C test to screen for diabetes, but they mainly use it to assess long-term glucose control in patients who have diabetes. In addition, people with diabetes perform frequent glucose monitoring on their own with glucose meters.

Scientists have been trying to develop diabetes tests that are painless and more accurate. One tool that has been under development is a desktop device that briefly shines fluorescent light on a patient's forearm to detect biological markers in the skin that are known as advanced glycation end products (AGEs). Research has shown that AGEs can indicate diabetes and predict its complications.

Researchers from the University of New Mexico School of Medicine and several companies, including the manufacturer of the fluorescent device, compared a prototype to the FPG and glycohemoglobin test. They studied 351 volunteers ages 21 to 86 who were at risk for prediabetes or diabetes. To confirm results they used a blood test called the oral glucose tolerance test, which is more complicated and specific than the FPG.

In detecting 100 milligrams of glucose per deciliter of blood, the cutoff for diagnosing prediabetes, the FPG had 58 percent sensitivity, the glycohemoglobin test, 64 percent sensitivity and the fluorescent device, 75 percent sensitivity, the researchers reported. Thus it was 29 percent more accurate than the FPG and 17 percent more accurate than the glycohemoglobin test in revealing prediabetes or diabetes, without an increase in false positives (incorrectly identifying impaired glucose in someone with normal glucose), they stated.

The device is scheduled to become available in early 2008.

The study was presented last week at the 2006 Scientific Assembly of the American Academy of Family Physicians, according to the researchers.

Copyright 2000-2006 HealthCentersOnline Inc.

 

Alternative Therapies

Melanoma Skin Cancer

Complementary and Alternative Cancer
Care Guidelines

Cancer Treatment Research Library

Dangerous Doctors
...is yours safe?

Cancer Archives

 

 

MEMBERSHIPS:     

About us
Privacy policy
Conditions of use

 


Nat'l Cervical
Cancer Coalition

logo nbtf
National Brain
Tumor
Foundation


Nat'l Ovarian
Cancer Coalition


Breast Cancer
Research

MCN
My
Cancer News

 

Special
Thanks
 TECH SUPPORT

Codebrain
Codebelly


NOTICE:  No information on this CANCER research site is provided, intended or implied to substitute for trained, professional medical advice, CANCER diagnosis or CANCER treatmentAs a condition of use of this cancer website, all visitors agree to seek trained medical advice before using any cancer treatment or cancer information found on this website and agree discuss these with their physicians prior to use and to hold RobertsReview and all entities affiliated with, contributing to, and/or operating this cancer research website harmless in regard to all information provided herein and/or from any decisions that may flow from use of this information.  RobertsReview in no way recommends, endorses or verifies the accuracy or claims of any of the cancer information provided herein by "third parties" regardless of their affiliation.

©1997-2006 RobertsReview, Wickford, RI USA. No information contained on this website may be reproduced in any form in any media.  Single copies may be reprinted for non-commercial use.