HOME CANCER GLOSSARY  CANCER PHOTOS  NEW CANCER BOOKS  LINKING  ADVERTISE

   
 

Free Financial Help for Cancer Patients
Gov't regulated program

Breast Cancer "Switch" Found

Cancer Pictures

Best Natl Cancer Ctrs

Cancer Centers
by State


Cancer Societies

Newest Treatments
by cancer type

MyCancerNews.com

Cancer Newsletters

Medical Journals

Cancer Calculator

Nat'l Cancer Inst.

MedLine Cancer

Chemotherapy

Other helpful links

Additional Help
for Cancer Patients

More Cancer Photos

Cancer Current Topics in Cancer

New Strategies for Hard to Treat CML


Watch Video

Summary & Participants

Standard treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia can occasionally fail. New studies show an increasing number of alternative treatments may be available.

Medically Reviewed On: July 10, 2008

Webcast Transcript


ANNOUNCER: Doctors treating chronic myeloid leukemia now have 54 months of experience with imatinib. The drug, also known as Gleevec, is the standard of care for treating most people with the disease.

BRIAN DRUKER, MD: The most recent updates on Gleevec are showing that for newly diagnosed patients with chronic phase CML, they're doing extraordinarily well. Overall survival at four and a half years is 90 percent. What's really interesting about the most recent data is that the rate of relapse, in other words, the percent of patients or the numbers of patients relapsing per year, actually may be decreasing a little bit. And if that trend holds, there could even be a plateau on the survival curve, meaning that patients could live for decades, potentially. I certainly don't want to make too much of that, because it's early data, but at least there's a hint that we're headed in that direction.

ANNOUNCER: Effectiveness in treating CML can be measured by checking whether a sample of white blood cells, when viewed under the microscope, harbors the abnormal chromosome responsible for the disease. This is a test for what's called the "chromosomal response."

A major chromosomal response is good. A complete chromosomal response is better. The latest data, also from the so-called IRIS trial, shows improving responses by these measures.

MICHAEL DEININGER, MD, PhD: The rate of complete chromosomal [cytogenetic] responses in the latest update of the IRIS trial was 86 percent. So this is still improving, compared to last year, and the major chromosomal response rate is at over 90 percent .

ANNOUNCER: Doctors also monitor CML with more sensitive testing, called molecular testing, or PCR. When patients quickly achieve a significant reduction in their disease at one year, as measured by PCR, new data shows their prognosis may be very good.

MICHAEL DEININGER, MD, PhD: The patients who achieve very substantial reduction of their disease burden at 12 months continue to do extremely well with almost nobody going to blast crisis or accelerated phase. So it seems, for the majority of patients that are newly diagnosed, standard dose imatinib treatment is highly efficacious and relapse is the exception if not the rule.

ANNOUNCER: Scientists are also reporting on early, small-scale studies with new drugs that may prove valuable for the patients whose disease shows resistance to Gleevec. Data from a phase I study of dasatinib shows a significant response in many patients.

Page 1 of 3 Next Page >>

 

Alternative Therapies

Melanoma Skin Cancer

Complementary and Alternative Cancer
Care Guidelines

Cancer Treatment Research Library

Dangerous Doctors
...is yours safe?

Cancer Archives

 

 

MEMBERSHIPS:     

About us
Privacy policy
Conditions of use

 


Nat'l Cervical
Cancer Coalition

logo nbtf
National Brain
Tumor
Foundation


Nat'l Ovarian
Cancer Coalition


Breast Cancer
Research

MCN
My
Cancer News

 

Special
Thanks
 TECH SUPPORT

Codebrain
Codebelly


NOTICE:  No information on this CANCER research site is provided, intended or implied to substitute for trained, professional medical advice, CANCER diagnosis or CANCER treatmentAs a condition of use of this cancer website, all visitors agree to seek trained medical advice before using any cancer treatment or cancer information found on this website and agree discuss these with their physicians prior to use and to hold RobertsReview and all entities affiliated with, contributing to, and/or operating this cancer research website harmless in regard to all information provided herein and/or from any decisions that may flow from use of this information.  RobertsReview in no way recommends, endorses or verifies the accuracy or claims of any of the cancer information provided herein by "third parties" regardless of their affiliation.

©1997-2006 RobertsReview, Wickford, RI USA. No information contained on this website may be reproduced in any form in any media.  Single copies may be reprinted for non-commercial use.