HOME CANCER GLOSSARY  CANCER PHOTOS  NEW CANCER BOOKS  LINKING  ADVERTISE

   
 

Free Financial Help for Cancer Patients
Gov't regulated program

Breast Cancer "Switch" Found

Cancer Pictures

Best Natl Cancer Ctrs

Cancer Centers
by State


Cancer Societies

Newest Treatments
by cancer type

MyCancerNews.com

Cancer Newsletters

Medical Journals

Cancer Calculator

Nat'l Cancer Inst.

MedLine Cancer

Chemotherapy

Other helpful links

Additional Help
for Cancer Patients

More Cancer Photos

Breast Cancer Current Topics in Breast Cancer

“DES Daughters” at Risk for Breast Cancer


Author:

Karen Barrow

Medically Reviewed On: October 24, 2006

Daughters of women who took the drug diethylstilbestrol (DES) during pregnancy may be at a greater risk for breast cancer, say researchers from the Boston University School of Public Health.

DES was commonly prescribed for over 40 years to prevent miscarriage, but prescription of the drug stopped after research showed that women taking DES had a higher risk of breast cancer. Additionally, their daughters were more likely to develop a type of vaginal and cervical cancer and have difficulty getting pregnant or delivering a healthy baby.

But as the daughters exposed to DES begin to enter menopause, the time when breast cancer risk is higher for all women, researchers have found that on top of all of these other risks, DES daughters also have a greater risk of developing breast cancer.

“This is really unwelcome news because so many women worldwide were prenatally exposed to DES, and these women are just now approaching the age at which breast cancer becomes more common,” said Dr. Julie Palmer, lead study author and professor of epidemiology at the Boston University School of Public Health.

In the early 1900s, scientists believed that low estrogen levels caused pregnant women to either have a miscarriage or deliver early. To combat this, DES, a synthetic estrogen, was developed and given to as many as 10 million pregnant women. Even though research in 1950 showed that DES did not lower the risk of having a miscarriage, it was still prescribed through 1971 until the FDA banned the use of the drug.

For the study, published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, Palmer looked at almost 5,000 women who had been exposed to DES in the womb and 2,000 women who were not exposed. Among the DES daughters, 76 reported being diagnosed with breast cancer, while only 26 of the unexposed women developed the disease.

Ultimately, women over the age of 40 who were exposed to DES in the womb have twice the risk of developing cancer as the rest of the population, the researchers concluded. Additionally, it seems that DES daughters over the age of 50 have an even higher risk of developing breast cancer, but more work needs to be done to determine the severity of that risk.

Regardless of individual risk, Palmer and colleagues urge all women exposed to DES to tell their doctors and have annual mammograms to screen for breast cancer. And since hormonal supplements for menopause only increase one’s risk of breast cancer even more, DES daughters should think twice before taking them.

“It might be wise for exposed women to avoid such supplements,” said Palmer.

 

Alternative Therapies

Melanoma Skin Cancer

Complementary and Alternative Cancer
Care Guidelines

Cancer Treatment Research Library

Dangerous Doctors
...is yours safe?

Cancer Archives

 

 

MEMBERSHIPS:     

About us
Privacy policy
Conditions of use

 


Nat'l Cervical
Cancer Coalition

logo nbtf
National Brain
Tumor
Foundation


Nat'l Ovarian
Cancer Coalition


Breast Cancer
Research

MCN
My
Cancer News

 

Special
Thanks
 TECH SUPPORT

Codebrain
Codebelly


NOTICE:  No information on this CANCER research site is provided, intended or implied to substitute for trained, professional medical advice, CANCER diagnosis or CANCER treatmentAs a condition of use of this cancer website, all visitors agree to seek trained medical advice before using any cancer treatment or cancer information found on this website and agree discuss these with their physicians prior to use and to hold RobertsReview and all entities affiliated with, contributing to, and/or operating this cancer research website harmless in regard to all information provided herein and/or from any decisions that may flow from use of this information.  RobertsReview in no way recommends, endorses or verifies the accuracy or claims of any of the cancer information provided herein by "third parties" regardless of their affiliation.

©1997-2006 RobertsReview, Wickford, RI USA. No information contained on this website may be reproduced in any form in any media.  Single copies may be reprinted for non-commercial use.